
Introduction to Earthquakes | Earthquake Prediction
Thanks | Disclaimer | Sources
Important Site Information | About Me
Earthquakes are the most destructive and powerful natural disasters. Within the time span of seconds they can flatten cities and kill thousands.
All of the land and water of the earth sit atop twenty major tectonic plates. These plates are large "chunks" that make up the earth's surface, the crust. These plates are like giant puzzle pieces that don't exactly fit together. The plates are always in motion, and every once in a while large pieces of rock snag and break (called elastic rebound), causing earthquakes. Faults are the places where these plates meet and where about 95% of all earthquakes happen. There are different types of faults. Some plates slide past each other in opposite directions horizontally, creating transform faults. One example of a transform fault is the well-known San Andreas fault of California. Subduction zones, or convergent fault boundaries, are the results of one piece of land sliding under another. These are the sites of the biggest earthquakes. A good example of a convergent fault is the boundary of the Nazca and South American plates (the Andes). The Himalayas were also created due to a convergent fault boundary. The majority of volcanoes also erupt at convergent fault boundaries. The other type of fault is called a divergent fault. These are the opposite of convergent faults, spreading apart instead of pushing together. One very good example lies at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean, called the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
Distant earthquakes are measured by seismographs. There are many types of seismographs, and they can cost from just a few hundred dollars to several hundred thousand. A simple seismograph can measure the motion of the ground in one direction, usually up and down. Most seismographs operated by professional geologists, however, can measure ground motion in all three directions, north-south, east-west, and vertically. These seismographs are linked to computers that are synchronized to the atomic clock which receive the data from the seismograph, amplify it, and store it. The United States Geological Survey in Golden, Colorado receive live data from all around the world. The data is also sent to a couple of other stations to ensure that it is not lost in the event of a malfunction at the main Earthquake Center Headquarters. Other instruments called Strong Motion Accelerometers measure the heavy shaking near fault boundaries.
Earthquakes can be measured in a variety of different ways. The most commonly used scale among the media is the Richter Scale (Mb). The Richter Scale is actually a measure of wave amplitude and is logarithmic. This means that a magnitude 2 earthquake has a ground motion of ten times that of a magnitude 1 earthquake and a magnitude 3 earthquake has the ground motion 100 times that of a magnitude 1 earthquake. Charles Richter came up with this scale. Since he chose zero arbitrarily, the scale (theoretically) has no upper or lower limits, although seismologists theorize that the rock of tectonic plates cannot withstand the tension of an earthquake greater than magnitude 9.5. A magnitude -1 earthquake is roughly equivalent to a 1-kilogram brick dropped from 200 meters. The energy released by an earthquake also rises exponentially. A magnitude 2 earthquake releases 32 times as much energy (not ground motion!) as a magnitude 1 earthquake. The scale by which the energy of earthquakes are measured is called the Moment Scale (Mw). This scale measures the amount of energy released from an earthquake, rather than the ground motion resulting from it. If you put your hands close together, face down, on a long table and push/pull them in opposite directions as hard as you can, the table will very likely not move very much. But if you put your hands at opposite ends of the table and then move them in opposite directions, the table will rotate with much greater ease. This is the way the Moment Scale works. It is the product of the energy and the area over which it is released. It is measured on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the release of most energy. Another way in which earthquakes are measured is the intensity. Intensity is the measure of the effects that the earthquake has on common objects. The most commonly used Intensity scale is the Modified Mercalli Scale. The intensity is marked by a roman numeral from I - XII:
Abridged Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale *[1]
|
Intensity |
Description of Effects |
|
I |
Not felt except by a very few under especially favorable circumstances. |
|
II |
Felt only by a few persons at rest, especially on upper floors of buildings. Delicately suspended objects may swing. |
|
III |
Felt quite noticeably indoors, especially on upper floors of buildings, but many people do not recognize it as an earthquake. Standing automobiles may rock slightly. Vibration like passing of truck. Duration estimated. |
|
IV |
During the day felt indoors by many, outdoors by few. At night some awakened. Dishes, windows, doors disturbed; walls make creaking sound. Sensation like heavy truck striking building. Standing automobiles rocked noticeably. |
|
V |
Felt by nearly everyone, many awakened. Some dishes, windows, and so on broken; cracked plaster in a few places; unstable objects overturned. Disturbances of trees, poles, and other tall objects sometimes noticed. Pendulum clocks may stop. |
|
VI |
Felt by all, many frightened and run outdoors. Some heavy furniture moved; a few instances of fallen plaster and damaged chimneys. Damage slight. |
|
VII |
Everybody runs outdoors. Damage negligible in buildings of good design and construction; slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures; considerable in poorly built or badly designed structures; some chimneys broken. Noticed by persons driving cars. |
|
VIII |
Damage slight in specially designed structures; considerable in ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse; great in poorly built structures. Panel walls thrown out of frame structures. Fall of chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, walls. Heavy furniture overturned. Sand and mud ejected in small amounts. Changes in well water. Persons driving cars disturbed. |
|
IX |
Damage considerable in specially designed structures; well-designed frame structures thrown out of plumb; great in substantial buildings, with partial collapse. Buildings shifted off foundations. Ground cracked conspicuously. Underground pipes broken. |
|
X |
Some well-built wooden structures destroyed; most masonry and frame structures destroyed with foundations; ground badly cracked. Rails bent. Landslides considerable from river banks and steep slopes. Shifted sand and mud. Water splashed, slopped over banks. |
|
XI |
Few, if any (masonry) structures remain standing. Bridges destroyed. Broad fissures in ground. Underground pipelines completely out of service. Earth slumps and land slips in soft ground. Rails bent greatly. |
|
XII |
Damage total. Waves seen on ground surface. Lines of sight and level distorted. Objects thrown into the air. |
Thousands of earthquakes happen every day. Most of them are very small and cannot even be felt. Earthquakes can barely be felt at the epicenter starting at about magnitude 2.5-3.0. They can start causing damage at about magnitude 4.5-5.0. The focus of an earthquake is the actual place underground where the rock rupture occurs, the epicenter is the place on the surface directly above the focus.
The following table shows the annual frequency of earthquakes worldwide, based on Richter Magnitude, along with Richter Magnitude in relation to Mercalli Intensity and Range of Perceptibility.
Relation Between Magnitude, Intensity, and Perceptability *[2]
|
Richter Magnitude |
Mercalli Intensity | Annual Average | Radius of Perceptability (km) |
| 8.0+ | XI | 0.3 | 600 (375 miles) |
| 7.0 - 7.9 | IX - X | 18 | 400 (250 miles) |
| 6.0 - 6.9 | VII - VIII | 120 | 220 (140 miles) |
| 5.0 - 5.9 | VI - VII | 3,000 | 150 (95 miles) |
| 4.0 - 4.9 | V | 15,000 | 80 (50 miles) |
| 3.0 - 3.9 | III | (About 1,000 daily) | 15 (10 miles) |
| 2.0 - 2.9 | I - II | (About 3,000 daily) | 0 (0 miles) |
Just what were the biggest earthquakes? The following table explains the biggest earthquakes, according to earthquake magnitude, in the 20th century.
The Largest Earthquakes of the 20th Century *[3]
| Date (M.D.YYYY) | Location | Moment Magnitude (Mw) |
| 5.22.1960 | Off coast of Central Chile | 9.5 |
| 3.28.1964 | Prince William Sound, Alaska | 9.2 |
| 11.4.1952 | Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia | 9.0 |
| 1.31.1906 | Off coast of Ecuador and Colombia | 8.8 |
| 3.9.1957 | Andreanof Islands, Alaska | 8.8 |
| 11.6.1958 | Kuril Islands | 8.7 |
| 2.4.1965 | Rat Islands, Alaska | 8.7 |
| 8.15.1960 | China / Tibet / India Region | 8.6 |
| 11.11.1922 | Central Chile / Argentina Region | 8.5 |
| 2.1.1938 | Indonesia | 8.5 |
Most seismologists say "Right now earthquake prediction is impossible, but maybe someday." What I have been doing for the past couple of years is trying to predict significant earthquakes with a high degree of accuracy. The way that I predict earthquakes largely involves the relationship of the gravity of the sun and the moon. This may sound like astrology, but IT IS NOT. I do not use ANY form of astrology, numerology, witchcraft, magic, etc. for my predictions. I use astronomy as well as certain geomagnetic data to make my predictions. I use key lunar events most often to make my predictions. Because there are only a certain number of significant astronomical events each year, I am not able to predict every large earthquake that will occur. People, many of them scientists, have told me that the method that I use has no scientific basis whatsoever. However, it is a proven, scientific fact that at times of high tide, the moon does not only act upon the water, but also the land. At average distance, the moon actually lifts the crust about six inches everyday. I am using this data from the sun and moon, and to a lesser degree, regional seismic activity patterns on the earth to accurately predict significant earthquakes.
For an earthquake prediction to be valid, it must contain three specific elements: a time, location, and size. In the past, I have not provided sufficient information for these elements, but you will now find them from here forth on all of my prediction reports. Time means a specified time range. If you say that an earthquake will happen on Thursday and it actually happens on Friday, does that mean that your prediction was correct because it was close enough? The correct way is not to produce one generalized, hazy date or time, but to set down a specific start time and a specific end time. This time range may be anywhere from a couple of hours to several months. Most of my predictions have a time range of around a week, which is specified on the dedicated page for a certain prediction. The next factor, location, is very important as well. Simply saying "there will be an 6.0 earthquake" does not work, because, as we can see from the table above, a 6.0 earthquake occurs on average about once every three days worldwide. Saying "there will be a 6.0 in Los Angeles" is better, but not much. Does the predictor mean Los Angeles County? City? Southern California? The location of a prediction can be correctly specified in several ways. One method, in fact the one that I use, is a set radius around a specific longitude and latitude. Another way uses the shape of a rectangle instead of a circle, which is also acceptable. This is commonly expressed in terms of latitude and longitude (i.e. within 35-30°N latitude, 100-105° W longitude). The last element, size, is expressed on the Richter Scale and contains both upper and lower limits (i.e. 6.0-6.5).
In addition to these three specific elements, you will find a value marked "Random-Chance Probability" on each of my earthquake prediction reports. This is the likelihood of an earthquake of the specified magnitude occurring within the target area, based upon past regional seismicity. First, I take the number of earthquakes in the past that have occurred within the prediction area from the USGS Database. Then, I take the period of the database and divide it into time intervals of the same length as the predicted time span. Then, I use these numbers in the following calculation:
P (Probability) = 1 - (number of earthquakes) / (sum of intervals)
This is similar to the method of deriving probability that is used at
Zhonghao Shou's Short-Term Earthquake Prediction Website. On my Past Predictions page, the value displayed is the corrected probability, that is, the probability of the real earthquake occurring when and where it actually did (and its actual size), in relation to the predicted values.
A special thanks to all of you who have visited my website and sent me email over the past year. Thanks for your support, interest, and kind suggestions!
I am a student of seismology. Since the science of earthquake prediction is very experimental, the methods are somewhat undefined. Therefore, these predictions are merely guesses. All information, including predictions and methods described herein (terremoto.8m.com), are property of the author.
All dates on this site are displayed in the format Month.Day.Year. I have recently updated this site to make it more browser-friendly. However, if you should encounter any technical problems, please contact me right away.
My name is Ian Montaņo and I am 15 years old and a sophomore (10th grade) in high school. I have always been interested in earthquakes and earthquake phenomena, and I have always been fascinated with the possibility of earthquake prediction. A couple of years ago, I began to form my own opinions and theories and began to try to predict where the next earthquake would occur. This information eventually came to be presented in the form of this website, where I am sharing my information with the public. If you would like to contact me, my email address is terremoto@visto.com.
*[1] From Earthquakes, by Bruce A. Bolt, 1993.
*[2] From "Seismicity Of The Rio Grande Rift in New Mexico," 1972.
*[3] From "Largest Earthquakes in the World," National Earthquake Information Center Website, 1999.